The real reason remains in history. I think you do not know that the blouse was not a part of sari or Indian culture, before all these invasions in the name of jihad and colonization, everything we hesitate to say or say publicly is very common. And she has women breasts.
This was not a big deal then and they would strip their upper bodies naked like men do now. And the idols of the goddess were also the same and it was made in this way.
After the rape culture started by the Mughals and the Islamic invaders, they started covering themselves and when the Britishers came they forced them to cover themselves but still in some villages we were wearing sarees without blouses or bras. Women can see. So that's why some pictures and idols have Maa Kali covered in them and some don't.
1: Some people are commenting on completely irrelevant things, why is it that you read 'Jihad' and 'Islamic invasion' and get triggered. Can't you read the whole thing, I targeted the invaders here It is not your choice to keep any religion so quiet or continuing.
2: There are some people (jinko mai bado ka nhi, quora moderation ka lihaaz rkh kr boluga nhi kuch) who are completely ignorant. Apparently women cannot get back to that normal because breasts are forgotten, even shorts invite unsuspecting stares and comments and they would not be comfortable to describe themselves as 'a symbol of decency' at the outset And after this you can't change society in one picture so stop reacting to the girls' reactions now and ask them to follow some random dude as well.
And international historians I agree with you and you are not wrong, but here I talked about a fashion statement, as if there were different styles, different fashions now.
You see 6 and I think 9 does not always mean, one is wrong. We are looking at it from different perspectives and angles.
Comments